The #1 Baby Names: How popular are they?

The #1 Baby Names: How popular are they?

By Kelli Brady, NameFreak!

Most of us know that the top names on the Social Security list aren’t given to as many babies as they once were.  Here, data whiz Kelli shows how the Number 1 names have become less and less popular through the years, tracing the percentages of babies given the top name from 1880 to now.

YEAR

#1 BOY

PERCENTAGE

#1 GIRL

PERCENTAGE

1880

John

8.1546%

Mary

7.2384%

1881

John

8.0981%

Mary

6.9989%

1882

John

7.8316%

Mary

7.0425%

1883

John

7.9071%

Mary

6.6730%

1884

John

7.6478%

Mary

6.6989%

1885

John

7.5517%

Mary

6.4304%

1886

John

7.5821%

Mary

6.4331%

1887

John

7.4190%

Mary

6.3620%

1888

John

7.1187%

Mary

6.2042%

1889

John

7.1808%

Mary

6.1559%

1890

John

7.1027%

Mary

5.9892%

1891

John

7.0293%

Mary

5.9536%

1892

John

6.8760%

Mary

5.8572%

1893

John

6.6498%

Mary

5.6758%

1894

John

6.5957%

Mary

5.5731%

1895

John

6.5703%

Mary

5.4413%

1896

John

6.3055%

Mary

5.4806%

1897

John

6.1914%

Mary

5.4020%

1898

John

6.1766%

Mary

5.2548%

1899

John

6.0678%

Mary

5.3222%

1900

John

6.0618%

Mary

5.2574%

1901

John

5.9680%

Mary

5.1669%

1902

John

5.9571%

Mary

5.1673%

1903

John

5.8835%

Mary

5.1312%

1904

John

5.8537%

Mary

5.1163%

1905

John

5.6261%

Mary

5.1850%

1906

John

5.7360%

Mary

5.2227%

1907

John

5.6643%

Mary

5.2102%

1908

John

5.6151%

Mary

5.2651%

1909

John

5.4229%

Mary

5.2320%

1910

John

5.4915%

Mary

5.4462%

1911

John

5.5704%

Mary

5.5203%

1912

John

5.4462%

Mary

5.5058%

1913

John

5.4688%

Mary

5.5953%

1914

John

5.5531%

Mary

5.6927%

1915

John

5.4008%

Mary

5.6830%

1916

John

5.4205%

Mary

5.6585%

1917

John

5.4052%

Mary

5.7207%

1918

John

5.3929%

Mary

5.6034%

1919

John

5.2721%

Mary

5.6047%

1920

John

5.1699%

Mary

5.7055%

1921

John

5.1173%

Mary

5.7817%

1922

John

5.0888%

Mary

5.7851%

1923

John

5.0754%

Mary

5.7196%

1924

Robert

5.2006%

Mary

5.6738%

1925

Robert

5.2897%

Mary

5.5901%

1926

Robert

5.3353%

Mary

5.5149%

1927

Robert

5.3082%

Mary

5.7122%

1928

Robert

5.3175%

Mary

5.5940%

1929

Robert

5.4012%

Mary

5.4867%

1930

Robert

5.5016%

Mary

5.4990%

1931

Robert

5.6590%

Mary

5.4646%

1932

Robert

5.5158%

Mary

5.4122%

1933

Robert

5.3145%

Mary

5.3058%

1934

Robert

5.2593%

Mary

5.2590%

1935

Robert

5.2856%

Mary

5.0681%

1936

Robert

5.4963%

Mary

5.0458%

1937

Robert

5.6539%

Mary

5.0506%

1938

Robert

5.4806%

Mary

4.9246%

1939

Robert

5.2635%

Mary

4.8419%

1940

James

5.2667%

Mary

4.7582%

1941

James

5.3185%

Mary

4.6577%

1942

James

5.4808%

Mary

4.5487%

1943

James

5.5183%

Mary

4.6105%

1944

James

5.5402%

Mary

4.5719%

1945

James

5.4288%

Mary

4.4042%

1946

James

5.2990%

Mary

4.1829%

1947

James

5.1009%

Linda

5.4838%

1948

James

4.9702%

Linda

5.5205%

1949

James

4.8213%

Linda

5.1845%

1950

James

4.7384%

Linda

4.5729%

1951

James

4.5656%

Linda

4.0038%

1952

James

4.4113%

Linda

3.5264%

1953

Robert

4.3065%

Mary

3.3359%

1954

Michael

4.2795%

Mary

3.4156%

1955

Michael

4.2272%

Mary

3.1514%

1956

Michael

4.2254%

Mary

2.9986%

1957

Michael

4.2380%

Mary

2.9128%

1958

Michael

4.2036%

Mary

2.7043%

1959

Michael

3.9369%

Mary

2.6210%

1960

David

3.9670%

Mary

2.4748%

1961

Michael

4.0319%

Mary

2.2958%

1962

Michael

4.0451%

Lisa

2.2737%

1963

Michael

4.0571%

Lisa

2.8190%

1964

Michael

4.0774%

Lisa

2.7733%

1965

Michael

4.2761%

Lisa

3.2981%

1966

Michael

4.4009%

Lisa

3.2421%

1967

Michael

4.6323%

Lisa

3.0544%

1968

Michael

4.6179%

Lisa

2.8975%

1969

Michael

4.6559%

Lisa

2.5550%

1970

Michael

4.4766%

Jennifer

2.5199%

1971

Michael

4.2678%

Jennifer

3.2409%

1972

Michael

4.2647%

Jennifer

3.9446%

1973

Michael

4.2039%

Jennifer

4.0192%

1974

Michael

4.1443%

Jennifer

4.0297%

1975

Michael

4.2181%

Jennifer

3.7283%

1976

Michael

4.1012%

Jennifer

3.7841%

1977

Michael

3.9549%

Jennifer

3.5851%

1978

Michael

3.9299%

Jennifer

3.4263%

1979

Michael

3.7808%

Jennifer

3.2920%

1980

Michael

3.7032%

Jennifer

3.2804%

1981

Michael

3.6928%

Jennifer

3.1906%

1982

Michael

3.6151%

Jennifer

3.1492%

1983

Michael

3.6506%

Jennifer

3.0377%

1984

Michael

3.6108%

Jennifer

2.8051%

1985

Michael

3.3742%

Jessica

2.6200%

1986

Michael

3.3424%

Jessica

2.8551%

1987

Michael

3.2651%

Jessica

2.9886%

1988

Michael

3.2043%

Jessica

2.6811%

1989

Michael

3.1210%

Jessica

2.4045%

1990

Michael

3.0351%

Jessica

2.2627%

1991

Michael

2.8687%

Ashley

2.1393%

1992

Michael

2.5916%

Ashley

1.9188%

1993

Michael

2.4003%

Jessica

1.7750%

1994

Michael

2.1825%

Jessica

1.6481%

1995

Michael

2.0596%

Jessica

1.4546%

1996

Michael

1.9155%

Emily

1.3124%

1997

Michael

1.8804%

Emily

1.3484%

1998

Michael

1.8066%

Emily

1.3512%

1999

Jacob

1.7346%

Emily

1.3639%

2000

Jacob

1.6516%

Emily

1.3015%

2001

Jacob

1.5736%

Emily

1.2657%

2002

Jacob

1.4797%

Emily

1.2394%

2003

Jacob

1.4104%

Emily

1.2813%

2004

Jacob

1.3201%

Emily

1.2415%

2005

Jacob

1.2148%

Emily

1.1803%

2006

Jacob

1.1334%

Emily

1.0244%

2007

Jacob

1.0962%

Emily

0.9150%

2008

Jacob

1.0363%

Emma

0.9040%

2009

Jacob

0.9981%

Isabella

1.1021%

2010

Jacob

1.0770%

Isabella

1.1698%

2011

Jacob

1.0024%

Sophia

1.1293%

2012

Jacob

0.9404%

Sophia

1.1531%

2013

Noah

0.9043%

Sophia

1.1039%

While starting out as less so, the boy names used are becoming more and more diverse. Only nine out of every 1,000 boys were named Noah in 2013, which is why we were surprised to hear it is #1.

The popularity of Isabella and Sophia have made it not as various on the girls side, after Emma took over with a “low” percentage in 2008, but there is still a general movement away from top names.

Another way to make the point…

1

Noah

0.9043%

Sophia

1.1039%

2

Liam

0.8999%

Emma

1.0888%

3

Jacob

0.8986%

Olivia

0.9562%

4

Mason

0.8793%

Isabella

0.9161%

5

William

0.8246%

Ava

0.7924%

6

Ethan

0.8062%

Mia

0.6844%

7

Michael

0.7681%

Emily

0.6832%

8

Alexander

0.7384%

Abigail

0.6449%

9

Jayden

0.7326%

Madison

0.5515%

10

Daniel

0.7068%

Elizabeth

0.4895%

8.1588%

7.9109%

The total percentages of use of the Top 10 boys and girls in 2013 are almost the exact same percentages of use of 1880’s #1s John and Mary alone.

Yay for numbers! And yay for variety!

Originally posted at NameFreak! on May 21, 2014 and revised for Nameberry.

About the Author

Kelli Brady

Kelli Brady

Kelli Brady is a stay at home mom of two who needed an outlet for her name obsession. She found it at NameFreak!, a blog dedicated to a wide variety of name-related whims and fancies. You can also follow her on Facebook and Twitter. Her eBook, Name-alytics, is a look at the history of the Top 100 names in the United States. Check it out at https://gumroad.com/l/name-alytics!