Vintage Baby Names
By Linda Rosenkrantz
I was asked by a magazine interviewer recently why I thought some vintage names come back and others don’t. Why Cora and Flora and not Dora? Why Edward and not Edwin? All of which got me thinking about the influences that do propel names out of the attic and into the spotlight.
The most obvious and evident of these is the celebrity factor in all its manifestations. Stars’ names, stars’ baby names and the names of characters they play:
Scarlett—Yes, the name of Miss Scarlett was used by a handful of parents following the publication of Gone With the Wind, but it wasn’t until Ms. Johansson burst on the scene that it really took off, bringing it now into the Top 50.
Isla –This old Scottish name was barely heard of or even pronounceable in this country before the emergence of the rising redheaded star Isla Fisher. Now it’s one of the fastest rising girls’ names—it entered the list in 2008 and is now at Number 167, with almost 2000 little American Islas born last year.
Sienna—Siena was a picturesque town in Tuscany until English actress Miller publicized the Sienna spelling and was instrumental in advancing her name into the Top 300 in the US, the Top 40 in England and Wales, and Australia.
Ava—And yes, stars of the past can also continue to exert an influence far beyond their own era. The sultry Ava Gardner was in her prime in the 1950s, yet became a 21st century hit, in the Top 10 for the last decade.
It’s also celebrity parents who have revitalized a whole raft of neglected names of the past, as in:
Indelible characters in blockbuster books and movies and TV shows have spawned a large share of the vintage name renaissance, particularly from franchises like Harry Potter and Twilight . Here are just a few:
The Fault in Our Stars—Hazel
And then there are less concrete factors.
The British Influence—Let’s face the fact that our cousins across the pond have been way ahead of us in certain significant trends. The vintage Amelia is their #1 name and Poppy is Number 7. It was the Brits who started the whole vintage nickname revival trend, with Evie, Millie, Rosie, Maisie, Ellie, Elsie, Tilly, Alfie, Archie, Freddie, Charlie, Theo, Frankie, Louie, Ollie, Teddy, Ronnie and Sonny all on their Top 100. As are Mad Men-era names that have yet to make it back big time in the US: Arthur, Harvey, Stanley, Leon—though there are signs that may be coming.
Sight & Sound—Both visual and aural pattern trends can lead to the advancement of some vintage names as well. A couple current ones:
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
on April 16th, 2015 at 8:16 am
These are my favorite kinds of nameberry posts–love the analysis (also love lists of unique categories)!
I think some parents just like vintage style. “Vintage” is big in fashion, weddings, etc. It’s the 100-year rule for some people who can look for names for themselves.
on April 16th, 2015 at 8:58 am
Silas has already been on the rise. I think the Timberlake fam is on trend and not making one…
on April 16th, 2015 at 9:50 am
Agree 100% with epowell.
on April 16th, 2015 at 10:50 am
Vintage names are more my style than “creative smooshes,” but that being said, it’s still a matter of pick and choose. I love Alice, Louise, Charlotte, Caroline, and Sarah, but am still getting used to Olive, Hazel, Pearl, Ruby. Just can’t see naming a contemporary child Beulah, Myrtle, Bertha, Ethel, Thelma. They seem fusty old-fashioned instead of charming vintage. Then again, I once thought the same about Mabel, Edith and Maud!
on April 16th, 2015 at 7:44 pm
Cool analysis. I’m definitely attracted to sound first, and having a good fictional character associated with a name is a bonus. I think sound preference is huge. Just looking at my great grandmas’ names: I have always preferred Violet and Pearl to Ruth and Mary.
on April 16th, 2015 at 9:29 pm
Twilight had no impact on Edward’s popularity. Why are we still perpetuating the myth that Twilight “resurrected” Edward? And Isabella’s meteoric rise began in the 90s… Twilight was published in 2005…
on April 18th, 2015 at 7:47 am
I think the writer over estimates how much influence celebrities have on name trends. I think celebrities are more likely to be on trend rather than setting trends.
leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.