Results 51 to 55 of 146
April 9th, 2013 09:51 PM #51
Thank you for that! My brain is pretty fried today.
I also made a thread in "All About Nameberry" for us to post names with descriptions that rub us the wrong way. Please add to it as you find more.
http://nameberry.com/nametalk/thread...-the-wrong-wayNathaniel . Eden | Alessandra . Noel
April 9th, 2013 09:52 PM #53Simon, Eloise/Louise, Faye, Judah, Thea, Felix, Iris, Cordelia, Roscoe, Lydia, Jasper, Phaedra, Adrian, Lucinda, Jane, Conrad, Wallace, Finnegan, Sylvie, Charlie, Dashiell, Juniper, Atlas, Matilda, Julian, Alice, Marlowe, Octavia, Jack, Marigold, Archer, Gabriel, Persephone, Raphael, Dov
Just a grad student, dreaming ahead...
April 9th, 2013 09:54 PM #55
While we're on the topic of name descriptions, I have an issue with Arthur being listed as a girl's name on this website. I also have an issue with this list: http://nameberry.com/list/247/Geezer-Names-for-Girls
It seems like any name that Pam or Linda perceive as dated or soft is suddenly "charming" on a girl. Call me crazy, but I wouldn't exactly call Randolph, Seymour, or Vernon "charming" on a girl.
The description for Arthur (girl) is this: "One of the old-school masculine names some very adventurous parents are adopting for girls."
I thought that was an interesting claim. I just checked the SSA lists from 2001-2011, and not surprisingly Arthur never shows up on the girls' list. If there were any unfortunate girls named Arthur in that ten-year span, there are less than 40. Definitely not enough to warrant Arthur being listed as a girl's name.
ETA: I posted this before I saw that east93 made a thread. I'll move this post to there.Helen ♢ Georgia ♢ Daphne ♢ Alice ♢ Jane
Edward ♢ James ♢ Theodore ♢ Kieran ♢ Samuel
April 9th, 2013 09:54 PM #57
April 9th, 2013 09:55 PM #59