The Social Security Name List–and how it grew
Since the Social Security site showing the rankings of baby names is the bible for so many nameberries, we thought we’d turn to webmaster Jeff Kunkel to give us some insight into how it developed–and his instrumental part in it.
Soon after Social Security joined the internet, I became webmaster for my office, the Office of the Chief Actuary. A high priority in those days was providing the public with information on cost-of-living increases and other things that affected Social Security beneficiaries. The lists of baby names begun by Michael Shackleford, who was then a co-worker, were decidedly a low priority.
However, the popularity of the baby name web pages soon became apparent. Dissatisfied with simply presenting the baby names as lists of the top 1000 names by sex for each year of birth, I wrote an interactive computer program that would allow people to select the year of birth, select the number of names to display, and select whether to display the number of occurrences of each name. In essence, the program allowed people to generate their own customized lists.
My desire to see how the popularity of my daughter’s name changed over time, coupled with the success of that list-generating program, inspired me to write another program that would provide a way to see time trends in the baby name data. The resulting new program proved to be even more popular than the list-generating program.
Over time I continued to add new features to our baby names website. These have included popular names by decade, popular names over the last 100 years, and, at the suggestion of a coworker, popular names for twins. With my education in statistics, I couldn’t help but wonder about changes in popularity, so I created a new page that shows the change in popularity between the most recent year and the previous year and another page that shows how changes in popularity are related to popularity—the more popular the name, the smaller the change.
From the beginning, there were people who wanted more than the top 1000 names. And in the early days, we naively provided the data per individual request. When I took over the project, I was concerned with the privacy issue that someone with an unusual name could be identified and his or her year of birth discovered and so I rejected all requests for more than the top 1000 names.
This year I was able to compile lists of names for names with at least 5o ccurrences in each year of birth. I put all of these lists, one for each year of birth going back to 1880, in a large “zip” file, and I provided access to the file from our page “Beyond the Top 1000 Names.” The fact that the names beyond the top 1000 are not available through our interactive program helps to ensure that our servers will not be overloaded.
As I approach retirement, I look back on my enhancements to the baby name pages with a sense of satisfaction because these pages have proven to be so popular. Also, developing these pages was an enjoyable experience, one of many that I’ve had while working at Social Security.
JEFF KUNKEL began his career with the Social Security Administration in 1973 as an actuary, rising to the position of supervisory actuary. He received a BA in mathematics from Lehigh University and an MA in statistics from Penn State, is married and has one daughter. He will be retiring on October 1.
comments
13 Responses to “The Social Security Name List–and how it grew”
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Jenny Says:
phaedra_p Says:
This is fascinating! Thanks for the insight, Jeff, and happy retirement to you.
Kristi Says:
Haha, I agree with Jenny. I’d be very curious if a child has truly been the only one with a name. All of the name data can’t be easy to track in the first place, though, so I’m not expecting to find this out anytime soon! And hooray to Mr. Kunkel! Thanks for the awesome SSA baby name list and congratulations on the retirement! Its interesting to read about your choices in developing the popular list.
SJ Says:
I also want to thank Mr. Kunkel for his work! I’m sure that sometimes it seemed trivial to some people, but it has really brought a lot of enjoyment and insight to many, and undoubtedly influenced the names of many children.
CharlotteC Says:
This is such an interesting interview – thanks for posting!
Bella Says:
Mr. Kunkel, you are one of my very favorite people!
PMcMScot Says:
Love the SS Baby Name list! Thank you so much, Mr. Kunkel – and thank you to your predecessor, Mr. Shackleford. Enjoy your retirement.
pam Says:
Jeff, I want to add my thanks and congratulations for expanding on the SS List, such an important document in the American annals of popular culture. And Jenny, I’m sure there are thousands upon thousands of truly unique, as in one-of-a-kind names, but those are a state secret! Definitely one that nameberry would really love to get its hands on…
Nephele Says:
Many thanks, Jeff — not only for a fascinating look into the development of the SSA Baby Names site, but also for finally releasing to the public all of those names “beyond the top 1,000.” I wish you a happy retirement this October, with hopes that the SSA will continue to give us those much sought-after names lists (especially “beyond the top 1,000″) after you are gone. Cheers!
Renee Says:
Thank you Jeff for all your work. I was on the SSA site almost daily for 9 months and I had SO MUCH FUN exploring the lists. Even now after being done with having kids, I love to go on and see where names stack up! Your hard work is so appreciated!
Madeleine Says:
Congratulations on your retirement! Quite an accomplishment. Enjoy it!
Lisa Says:
Congratulations on your retirement, Jeff! I’ve loved exploring the lists on the SSA site, and it was really neat to be able to hear from the person responsible for it. Thanks for all your hard work – it’s appreciated and enjoyed by so many people!
Melanie Says:
I’m curious – when did the Social Security start listing popular baby names on their website? The top 10 names of today are no where near as popular as of names of the past. I would like to look back to that year and see if that’s when the numbers started dropping off.
leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Search The Blog
Categories...
All posts from the Nameberry blog sorted by category
- Baby Name News
- Baby Names
- Baby Names Popularity
- Boy Baby Names
- Celebrity Names
- Classic Baby Names
- Cool Baby Names
- Family Names
- Gallery
- Girl Baby Names
- Guest Blog Posts
- Guest Bloggers
- Historic Names
- International Baby Names
- Meanings of Baby Names
- Middle, Last and Nicknames
- Name Image
- Names from the Arts & Pop Culture
- Nature, Place and Word Names
- Pregnancy & Baby
- Questions of the Week
- Sibling and Multiple Names
- Spellings, Sounds and Initials
- Trends and Predictions
- Unisex Baby Names
- Unusual Baby Names
Archives
All posts from the Nameberry blog sorted by date
Popular Posts
Some of our most popular blog posts
Recent Posts
Some of our most recent blog posts


I wonder just how many people end up with a name no one else received that year.
It’s seems impossible for it to happen at all, especially when five mothers decided Sophialauren was a good idea last year.