Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 11 to 15 of 21

Thread: Cute or Tacky?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    If not so obvious or very meaningful, theming isn't tacky but cute. For examples, it's fine for botanic scientists to have daughters Juniper and Rose but just to name kids Mercedes and Bentley - cheesy, cheesy, cheesy.

  2. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    My boys all have New Testament names which I guess is sort of a theme. But if I run out of ones I like I'll branch off in another direction.

  3. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    I'm on the fence on this. I think very obvious themes can work with twins. For example I know a pair called Ivy & Rose, and I think that's quite sweet together.

    Trying to force the same initial throughout a sibset, a la the Kardasians (eg. Khloe instead of Chloe), is tacky in my opinion.
    Girls: Alice, Anna, Astrid, Beatrice, Clara, Elodie, Emily, Evelyn, Hannah, Hermione, Lorna, Phoebe, Sophie, Sylvia
    Boys: Andrew, Arthur, Elliot, Griffin, Hamish, Henry, Leopold, Martin, Peter, Robin, Rupert, Thomas, Tobias, William
    Guilty Pleasures: Athena, Damaris, Digory, Emrys, Ganymede, Hester, Jessamine, Phineas, Myrtle, Nymeria, Nyx

  4. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    I like subtle themes. Ruby and Esmeralda doesn't bother me. Wren and Raven is cheesy. Lily and Rose isn't horrible, but I wouldn't do it.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    I find it kind of tacky when the connections are super obvious.
    Currently Loving:
    Rosemary, Ivy, Juniper
    Fox, Griffin

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts