Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 11 to 15 of 24
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Quote Originally Posted by renrose View Post
    CopyandPaste strikes again!

    Quote Originally Posted by ottilie View Post
    OMG I laughed so much at this!

    Haha! Love it! And I'm often quoting you two as well! Great minds think alike

  2. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    I would just think their names were Luke and Jake. I prefer the longer versions though as I feel that they would suit a baby, boy, man and older man better than just the shorter forms.

  3. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Yes, I would probably assume their full names were Lucas and Jacob, but who cares what I "assume?"

    If a boy introduced himself to me as Luke, I'd call him Luke. Even if I "assumed" his full name was Lucas, I'd still call him Luke. And I think the majority of everyone else on Earth is probably going to have the same reaction. Rarely, if ever, do I think he''s going to get the question "Oh, is that short for Lucas?" So, I wouldn't worry about it. Besides, Luke and Jake make a great sibset.

  4. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    I agree with all the above. I would assume Luke was just Luke but Jake I might think was Jacob. But, if he introduced himself as Jake, I'd call him Jake, and beyond that it wouldn't matter what I thought anyway. Cute names, too; I especially love Luke!
    "Mom" to two adorable puppies, Violet Annabelle Augusta & June Olivia Ottoline.

    Current loves:
    Adelaide | Antonia | Benedetta | Capucine | Charlotte | Cosima | Estelle | Marguerite | Saskia | Susannah | Viola | Wilhelmina
    Alaric | Anton | Bennett | Boone | Caspian | Francis | Gideon | Judah | Leo | Theodore | Vincent | Winslow

  5. #19
    No, I wouldn't think they were nicknames at all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts