Page 32 of 46 FirstFirst ... 22 30 31 32 33 34 42 ... LastLast
Results 156 to 160 of 230

Thread: Royal Baby

  1. #156
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    I doubt they'd go with William's full name, I don't think they'll go for William either (nor did I ever think they were going to name a daughter Catherine). I do think they'll include Arthur as that has been somewhat of a "tradition" since HM's father, George VI. I actually don't think it's impossible that they'll use it as a first name. Philip is also almost certain, either as a first or somewhere in the middle.
    Zelia • 20s • Exporting names from Greenland & Inuit mythology
    Alexander Adelin Lórien "Sasha" • Henry Ásgeirr Saxo • Asa Bjørnstjerne Ivik • Nor Valdemar Cosimo • Dante Endymion Sejr

    Vilde Ivalo Zenobia • Asta Cosima Gro • Léa Ingrid Cleopatra • Aviaaja Oona Lúthien "Avi" • Noor Galadriel Nanna

    And currently loving: Bertil, Folke, Julian, Pemba, Ville, Johanna, Karen, Madicken, Magda, Maru

  2. #158
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by anuthriuminvidia View Post
    Will and Kate are not pretentious. I don't see them naming the child directly after his father.
    I would love to see William's name in the mix.
    Psalm 23

  3. #160
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Royal baby is here! Catherine gave birth to a healthy baby boy, the Prince of Cambridge. The name is not announced yet.

  4. #162
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Columbus, OH
    I would like to see them use Richard, especially as this was the year the positively identified the remains of King Richard III, a much maligned king who in fact did a lot of good.

    The story that he murdered his two nephews (the Princes in the Tower) was most likely fabrication. All the rumors about him didn't start circulating until after he was defeated in battle by Henry VII, and it's now widely believed it was propaganda spread by Henry VII and those who served him, as the English people liked Richard III as he was a good king. Henry VII had to win over this subjects and creating falsehoods about Richard III was the best way to do this.

    The truth is though, he was a very good, well-respected King, who was an early social reformer. For example, he e implemented changes in the legal system at the time, allowing poorer people to be able to seek justice through the courts, something that previously was reserved for those who could afford it. This is fact.

    However, because of the unproven stories about him, the name Richard has been one of the "forbidden" names in the royal family ever since.

    I think it would be fitting, in the year his remains were identified (meaning he can now finally have a burial fit for a former King of England), to bring the name back into the fold. It would be a great tribute to someone who was, in reality, an excellent King who cared for his people.
    ⋆ Margaret Mary ⋆

    Elisabeth Aurelia ⋆ Iris Christabel ⋆ Ada Marianne ⋆ Harriet Cordelia
    Dorothea Helen ⋆ Charlotte Gwen ⋆ Josephine Violet ⋆ Sarah Clementine

    Asher Benedict ⋆ Joah Valentine ⋆ Samuel Archer ⋆ Nicholas Bertram
    August Lysander ⋆ John Willoughby ⋆ Gabriel Zachariah ⋆ Tobias Nathaniel

    Current guilty pleasures: Corliss + Winston

    Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it.

  5. #164
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Is Andrew a possibility? Will and Kate met and graduated from St. Andrews after all.
    ...dreaming of naming my future first cat.

    today's favorites: Howl, Sherlock, Scheherazade

    (and favorites of the non-pet names: Celia Hermione, Odette, Inigo, Arthur Rooney)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts