The New Generation of Boys’ Names

Gender identity takes a turn for the middle

comments

7 Responses to “The New Generation of Boys’ Names”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

CocoaPuff Says:

August 11th, 2017 at 1:44 pm

Since when is Jacob a girl’s name?

Liz Kent Says:

August 11th, 2017 at 1:54 pm

I love Jacob Thaddeus

QuirkFlower Says:

August 11th, 2017 at 3:11 pm

Sooooo many of my favorites make this list. I definitely have a “type.”

Kate4hisglory Says:

August 11th, 2017 at 5:03 pm

Um, why does it say that gender identity takes a turn? These are all decidedly male names. If someone decides to use them for a girl, that doesn’t automatically make it a unisex name. And just because they share sounds with girl names doesn’t make them any less masculine. I get it, gender equality is a big issue. But can we not be so equal that it takes away what is special and unique about our genders? Don’t try to emasculate these names, please.

beynotce Says:

August 12th, 2017 at 9:23 am

Interesting that nearly half of these “new generation” names are Biblical. I’m not sure if this speaks more to the conservativism of even the most stylish trends in boy names or to the rich variety of male names found in the Bible.

southern.maple Says:

August 12th, 2017 at 11:09 am

This post is utter nonsense and fails in its attempted argument. Kylo is the only “new” name here. Kai and Rowan are legitimate unisex names. Every other name you’ve listed is a conventionally masculine choice with an established history in the English-speaking world. Occasional usage on girls, similarity to popular girl names, and soft consonant sounds do not make a name unisex.

Penguinkin Says:

August 12th, 2017 at 4:08 pm

I found the collection of names interesting but would have liked to see graphical representation of the name usage to back up any ‘trend’.

leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.