Is it weird to name babies after animals?
by rosie on Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:21 am
Last week, my cousin had a baby. A couple of weeks before, her horse William died. She called her kid Firstname William after her horse. I've also been thinking about using Zoe as mn for a daughter, after my cat Zoe, who was my best friend for pretty much my whole life and recently died too :(. What do you guys think? Is this weird, or OK (well, if the animal has a "human" name - I pity any kids out there called Fido or Makybe Diva)?
Re: Is it weird to name babies after animals?
by evanescencedolly on Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:09 pm
I dont think so....If your pet was really close to you and you loved it alot I understand!
So...yeah!
~Bree
Re: Is it weird to name babies after animals?
by arilee_sc on Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:59 pm
No, I think it's perfectly fine! As long as the pet is no longer around. I knew a guy who had both a dog, and a daughter named Sarah at the same time. Besides being a bit odd, it caused a lot of confusion in coversation.
I plan on naming my future daughter after my beloved pet, Hannah Renee, as well.
Re: Is it weird to name babies after animals?
by nephele on Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:44 pm
In the TV series Frasier, both Frasier and his brother Niles were named after their mother's laboratory rats.
Your question just now reminded me of that.
-- Nephele
Re: Is it weird to name babies after animals?
by countrylizb on Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:26 am
arilee_sc wrote:I knew a guy who had both a dog, and a daughter named Sarah at the same time. Besides being a bit odd, it caused a lot of confusion in coversation.
It may not of been his fault. I have a sister named Rose and once my family had a goat named Rose. We didn't name the goat that, she came with the name. She was named after the Rose Bowl Parade, because she was born in January.
Re: Is it weird to name babies after animals?
by karen on Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:39 pm
I think that it's time for people to stop giving people names to animals. William and Sarah and Rose are people names. I don't think it's weird to name a child the same name or in honor of a pet, except I once had a neighbor whose kid was Richard Jr., but then after their dog died, they started calling this poor toddler Buddy - which had been what they called the dog.
I see a lot of cuckoo names on this site that seem more suited to a dog or a bird, it's when you mix them up, Kate and Max don't seem appropriate for a little baby anymore (too pet-like and probably seem extra-overused due to that), or you feel funny when you introduce your little Sadie and someone says, oh cool, that's my cat's name. I guess that's the trend I find a little uncomfortable - nobody's going to make fun of your dog at school so the freedom is there to go all out and break those rules.
:)
Re: Is it weird to name babies after animals?
by moxielove on Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:18 pm
I'm so glad you asked this question:
I've always LOVED the name Moxie but assumed my husband would never allow us to name our child Moxie. So when I got a kitten last August I named her Moxie. I got pregnant in December.
Moxie sadly died at the end of April. When I told my husband that not only was I sad that Moxie died, but also that such a fantastic name got so little use, he said he wouldn't mind a kid named Moxie.
SO. I figured I could never name our kid Moxie since everyone would think it really weird that we named our kid after our cat.
BUT I am so glad to hear people (generally) think it's OK. It's not like we're naming her AFTER the cat, just that the cat had a great name we want to use again....
Of course, you may think this is all a moot point if you hate the name Moxie!!....and our last name is Kelly so that really doesn't work well anyway....
Re: Is it weird to name babies after animals?
by jennifer on Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:45 pm
I think its fine, as long as it is a person name that the animal has.