Results 1 to 5 of 11
Thread: Opinions on my Top 10 Boys Names
March 13th, 2014 07:32 PM #1
March 13th, 2014 07:33 PM #3
March 13th, 2014 09:37 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
First, the yays:
Gideon - Adore, would use in a minute.
Elliott - Like, but probably wouldn't use.
Arthur - Nice, vintage quality.
Jax - Doesn't seem like a real name.
Keane - No.
James - Dull. Fine, but dull. More so than John even.
Addison - Don't care for it on a boy or a girl.
Porter - Of all the occupational names?
Madison - No.
Lennon - You're going to need someone who hates John Lennon less than I do. But ugh.
March 14th, 2014 11:59 AM #7
Gideon - a Biblical name full of energy
Jax - harsh and unattractive
Elliott - ok but not a favourite of mine
Keane - only if it's a family name
James - classic and traditional
Arthur - lots of character and depth and I love the King Arthur legend.
Addison - it's a disease
Porter- this occupation is still current
Madison - dislike it for either gender
Lennon - only if you're a big John Lennon fan and then only in the middle spot. What about Lennox which is half of Lennon and has the "x" of Jax?All the best,
March 14th, 2014 01:34 PM #9
I like Jax, but only as a nickname. I prefer Pax or Paxton.
I like Addison and Madison.
Elliott is very attractive even though it's not my favorite.
Gideon isn't my style, at least for now. Arthur isn't my style at all.
Keane is unusual, to me at least, and I like it. Handsome.
Porter is ok.
Lennon...don't like it much. Not horrid, just not my thing.
James is fine, I like Jamison better! but only as a middle or second middle name.
You may like: Taylor, Rylan, Ryland, Schuyler, Alaric, Geoffrey/Jeffrey, Graham, Vincent
Palmer, Hayden, Hendrix, Hayes, Bennett, Archer, Fletcher, August, Blaine