Results 1 to 5 of 10
Thread: Kirsty - is it still usable?
June 1st, 2014 04:19 PM #1
Kirsty - is it still usable?
A big GP of mine (for a while now) is the name Kirsty. I never really thought about it until I was about 15 years old, and met a couple of girls from the UK via Twitter with the name. They were all positive associations to the name, and therefore, I began to like it. The sound seemed nice, and I had no reason to dislike it, other than the fact that it happens to be very dated.
I don't know why I'm suddenly second-guessing it as an addition to my list, but I am. I still love the sound of the name, but, I fear it will suffer the same fate as the other various dated (particularly dated in the UK) name choices - Courtney, Nicola, Gemma, Kelsey, Stephanie, etc.
Do you think Kirsty is still a usable choice? I'm thinking about Kirsty-Louise or Kirsty Elizabeth, but I'm not 100% sure (then again, there's also Kirsty Elizabeth Louise). Filler names don't really bother me in the middle, if they're a name I truly like (so you won't see any Rose or Marie in the middle spot on my list), so that doesn't affect what I choose for me.♔ "In order to be irreplaceable, one must always be different." - Coco Chanel ♔
~ Florence ○ Lottie-Grace ○ Evelyn ○ Ivy ○ Elsie ○ Harriet ○ Libby ○ Betsy ○ Violet ○ Minnie ○ Annabelle ○ Martha ○ Milly ~
~ Charlie ○ Thomas ○ Ernest ○ Addison ○ Daniel ○ Henry ○ Alfie ○ James ○ Ethan ○ Albert ○ George ○ Andrew ~
June 1st, 2014 04:37 PM #3
I'm not sure about the UK, but Kirsty would seem very dated in the USA (as would Kirsten if you decided to use a longer full name). If you really love it, than use it. I love some dated names (ex Jason, Gregory, Paul) and the supposed "datedness" hasn't hindered my love for them; they don't seem dated to me. Some names seem dated to everyone (I'm thinking Gertrude, Gladys, etc), but with other names like Susan, Kirsten, or Jennifer, it is a relative term.
So, I guess what I'm trying to say that I personally find it dated, but if you love the sound, don't let others' opinions stop you. Kirsty is still usable, it isn't like Doris.Just another teenberry and writer, a lover of names
Current Favorites:| Zoe | Jane | Natalia | Cecily | Isabel | Margo | Ariadne | Marta | Athena | Eulalie |
| Dimitri | Linus | Gus | Augustus | Thomas | Jude | Basil | Jonas | Samuel | Jasper |
Pondering: | Alexander |
Have a fabulous day!
June 1st, 2014 08:30 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2011
June 1st, 2014 08:38 PM #7Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- East Midlands, UK
I'm from the UK so maybe my perspective is different, but I wouldn't bat an eye at a little Kirsty. I know one my age and she wears it just fine, it's never seemed strange or dated on her at all.
Most people wear their names pretty well, I find. And as said above, it's not as if you're naming her Doris.Livia, seventeen.
♂ Tobias Rowan | August Dmitri | ___________
♀ Saskia Maeve | Bryony Thalia | Eloise Carmen
June 1st, 2014 08:42 PM #9☆Isobel★Eloise☆Matilda★Alice☆Eleanor★ Amelia☆ Elena★Mirabel☆ Felicity★Phoebe ☆Eilidh ★Rosalia☆Roisin★Azalea☆Elsa★Arabella☆ Genevieve★Elodie☆Tallulah★Ruby☆
☆Eamon★Tiago☆Cooper★Jack☆Jago★Flynn☆ Archer★Lincoln☆Asher★Alfie☆Taylor★Baxter ☆Finnian★Lawson☆Jasper★Lewis ★Oscar☆Fletcher★Caspian☆Miller★
Future middle names will honour family