Results 21 to 25 of 89
Thread: Naming laws - what do you think?
February 10th, 2014 04:45 PM #21Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
I think naming laws are really interesting, but I would not want them in the US. In general, I am opposed to giving the government even more power over people's personal lives. If parents want to name their children Hudsyyn or Stryyker or Jaxxxon or what have you, they should have the freedom to do that. In the realm of bad parenting, giving your kid a ridiculous name doesn't even register.
It seems like a big reason for naming laws is to preserve the cultural integrity of a given country, as in Iceland or Germany. This would be far more difficult in a country like the US, which is made up of cultures from all over the world. We don't even have an official language here! So while it makes sense that Icelandic names have to work with Icelandic grammar, that would not be a good justification here.
February 10th, 2014 04:50 PM #23
I think it depends on a country. In some countries people are more daring when it comes to names and even if there're laws regarding naming children, they'll find the most obscure name on the list of approved names if they'd like their baby's name to stand out. In other countries people are conservative about names and won't get crazy even if they can. For example, in Russia we don't have naming laws, but people still use only about 100 names for each gender, while others are considered ridiculous.
As long as the list of approved names is long and diverse enough I'm pro. At least it'd spare us of kreatif spellings.polina
living in st. petersburg, russia
clementine ・ jemima ・ harriet ・ mabel
felix ・ sebastian ・ milo ・ oliver
February 10th, 2014 05:03 PM #25Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
Most people just have a patronymic - that's the "normal" thing. A few people have just a matronymic - it's actually usually an indication that the father isn't really in the kid's life for whatever reason, although it was sometimes used in medieval Iceland when the mother was of higher status than the father. Occasionally I think people choose to change it as adults, presumably when their mother means more to them than their father. A very few people have a patronymic and a matronymic (Jón Maríu- Jónsson would be one way of writing it) - it's more equal, but it can get a bit long-winded in my opinion.
These are formed by taking the genitive form of the name in question and sticking son or dóttir on the end. It would be Sigmundsdóttir or Sigmundsson for Sigmundur. Yeah it can get a bit long for some names.
They are most certainly an official part of how you are recorded, but I don't really think of them as part of a person's name per se. If you have John, son of Thomas, it's like a note added on to John's name more than anything. For this reason it makes absolutely no sense for marriage to affect an Icelander's name, because it doesn't change who your parents are. But if there were two people called Jón Helgi, then you would go to the patronymic, Jón Helgi Sigurðsson and Jón Helgi Jónsson.
There are not so many people here. If there were more I think maybe the system wouldn't work as well as it does.
February 10th, 2014 07:08 PM #27
John E. Edwards if he has a really generic name, but it is optional. Like I had 5 Amandas in my class and I still have no idea what their middle names are, as they either got referred to by a nickname to differentiate them like Panda or Amanda E. (E representative of a last name in this case) or Amanda King. Middle names are not that widely used, unless someone doesn't like their first name and prefers to be called by their middle name, which is not common but occasionally happens.
I just like some quirky names and wouldn't dream of using them as a first, so I think that a middle name would be the perfect place to have it without causing my child unnecessary trauma.
February 10th, 2014 07:17 PM #29Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
This is the beauty
of the United States of America: freedom of speech, freedom to be tacky, freedom to deviate from the norm.
No one wants to see a child named Nazi or Diarrhea, but I'd rather live in a society with freedom than without.