Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 6 to 9 of 9
  1. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    South Australia
    I think the judge went too far. If the parents agree on the first name there was no reason for her to change it. Although I think Messiah is a bit of a crazy name to use, that's their choice to make not the judges. I hope they win the apeal.

    As far as going to court over the surname goes, I know someone that had to. His ex left him for someone else when she was 8 months pregnant and he had to fight for his son to have his surname.
    The 3 Princesses in my life...

    Elizabeth Hope
    Annabelle Cadence
    Madeleine Pearl

  2. #8
    Join Date
    May 2013
    That's wrong. I don't think that the judge had any right to have her child renamed just because it upset her beliefs. I'm with the mom on this one.
    Ingrid Genevieve | Evanna Yvaine | Winifred Delphine | Saoirse Elaine
    Astra Gillian | Rose Morgana | Irene Lourdes | Danae Andromeda

    Damian Orion | Simon Cornelius | Gareth Evan | William Thierry
    Edmund Abraham | Wendell Eleazar | Shepherd Phoenix

  3. #10
    I agree with the judge that the name is inappropriate and could cause problems for the kid in the future. BUT... she overstepped her bounds here. The baby's first name isn't her choice--it's the choice of the parents. They will most likely win on appeal. I mean, 762 kids were given the name last year. It's not like it's unheard of.
    Silas ~ Gideon ~ Lincoln ~ Ezekiel ~ Malachi ~ Samuel ~ Ezra ~ Charlie ~ Gabriel ~ Elliott
    Maisie ~ Sophie ~ Naomi ~ Willa ~ Evangeline ~ Freya ~ Vivienne ~ Nora ~ Josephine ~ Daphne

  4. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    I know! I agree the name is tacky and in poor taste, but the judge does not have the right to change the name. I am a devout Christian, but I am not offended by this. It just makes me roll my eyes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts