Results 21 to 25 of 28
August 1st, 2013 08:03 PM #21
It's the type of name that's sort of outside of popularity since it's so ubiquitous. It's hard to say that I like or dislike it. It would be like not liking water, lol.
It's the sort that you'll never get a comment about. I can't imagine anyone ever saying, "yikes! John?" or "John? where'd that come from?". It's not bad or good really, it's just fine.
If you really love it, then go for it! It's not something anyone could sneer at unless they're snooty.Top Names: Benedict Calvin & Noelle Geneva
Olivia/Livy : Darah/Bethel : Eve/Verity
Eli/Solomon : Luke/Zane: Levi/Phineas
Due in January!
August 2nd, 2013 10:43 PM #23Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
August 3rd, 2013 04:34 PM #25baby BOY arriving november 2015
currently considering: Martin, Shepherd, Edmond, Teagan, Winston, Absalom
a girl would have been named: Beatrix Judith
avatar by *moogley-mog
August 3rd, 2013 07:05 PM #27
August 4th, 2013 04:40 AM #29Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
I like John. I find Johnny adorable on a boy, and John very wearable on pretty much any type of man. It's also the given name of one of my heroes and two of my favourite musicians. I prefer naming after people's first names than last names.
It can be Johnny or Jack. That's a nice flexibility. Every third newborn boy out here (Australia) seems to be being named Jack, Jackson, or Jaxon, but John itself is underused and feels relatively refreshing.
I do find Jonathan softer but Jonathan has a different, unrelated meaning/background and the spelling Johnathan drives me insaaaane with rage. Jonathan suffers from being confused with the more evergreen John, honestly. And calling a Jonathan Jack kinda doesn't work for me, only Jon or Jonny.