Names Searched Right Now:
Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 20 of 54
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    880
    I think most of us would be lying to say that you don't form some sort of quick judgement when you hear certain names...but to carry it so far as to imply that all Tylers are bad, or charmaines are trash, is just ignorant. To not let her children not play with those children based on their names is almost abusive
    Natacha - mother to Geneva Simone and Marlena Carys
    a site that surveys people with the same name.

    Current Favs:
    Boys: Archer Sloan or Merrick
    Girls: Indira Maren or Sloan

  2. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,593
    @ottilie - I agree with your points.

    Of course we shouldn't judge people (especially children) by their names. However, we all do it. Picture little Chardonnay or Nevaeh. What background would you assume they're from? Certain names are given by people of certain classes and there's some truth in her argument. She wants her children to play with "nice" children. However, it's an extremely prejudiced way of discerning which children are "nice". I can understand wanting your children to have friends who have good manners, do their homework, etc. But making a blanket judgement that all children named Tyler (for example) are "bad" isn't doing her or her children any favours. For me, the kicker was her dislike of place names...then admitting her daughter is called India. Silly woman.
    Audrey - Beatrice - Clara - Daphne - Flora - Jane - Mabel - Susannah

    Arthur - Barnaby - Edward - Frederick - Henry - Rupert - Theodore - Walter

  3. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A Town Called Alice
    Posts
    1,479
    Ergh... Just another argument about class (even though the topic is names).

    This kind of reminds me of the Catherine Tate skits

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUNssEtAwr8
    Ingrid | Kit | Susanna | Alistair

  4. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    5,340
    I just have to defend her a little bit in regards of India. Here in England it's got a solid history of usage, and when I hear India I don't think "place name" like I would if I heard Brooklyn, Ireland or other names like that. I get that it must sound ridiculous to people not from here, and obviously her making that comment was quite stupid, but I understand what she's saying. It's not a chav name.

    Oh, and Sarah & Scarlet; glad I'm not alone...
    [FONT=Palatino Linotype][CENTER]My darling Marian Illyria Aphrodite, March 2013 & Little Bunny (a girl!) due 9th of February 2014[/CENTER][/FONT]

  5. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    6,272
    Quote Originally Posted by jennifer94 View Post
    I find this very interesting because I am from the United States. Where I live, names like Tyler and Brandon are thought to be normal and acceptable names. Poppy and India would stand out much more here, not to say that they are not nice names.

    I find it sad that someone would judge anyone, never mind children, just because of their name. When her children get older, I think she will be in for a rude awakening when they start to choose their own friends. Wouldn't it be comical if little Poppy grew up and wanted to marry a Tyler?
    Yes, exactly!
    From our ancestors come our names, but from our virtues our honors. ~ Proverb

    Caroline Grace & James Frederick

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •