Results 1 to 5 of 15
June 29th, 2013 11:35 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
Could this boys name work for us?
DH has always loved River for a boy and though i love it I had initially dismissed it as its very at odds with our little girl Matilda's name. However I can't stop thinking about the name of late...I've been thinking that the names could potentially work together as we are hoping to have a few siblings for Matilda (2 or 3!) and I think they could work with some other names we love in the mix... I've been thinking Matilda, River, Wolfe and Aurora work well together as siblings... What do you think?
So wondering...what are your thoughts on River... Is it usable/too limiting? Too at odds with Matilda?? What would YOU name siblings of Matilda & River?
June 30th, 2013 05:21 AM #3
It is a tiny bit at odds with just the two names, but I really like your potential set of four!若兰
I'm just a third-culture girl with an affinity for names.
In loving memory of Margot
June 30th, 2013 08:42 AM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2011
June 30th, 2013 03:08 PM #7
I really like Matilda and River as siblings! Stylistically, they're quite different, but I still like them together. I think it works. My first thought for their siblings are Liv/Olive/Olivia/Livia (or even Lavinia, nn Liv?) and Clementine for girls, and oddly enough, Pascal for a boy. I think Matilda, River, Clementine, and Pascal would be amazing. Although I don't know why. haha. I think the nns Emmy (or even Cleo) and Cal would be really cool with Tilly and River.Ashley | namenerd | Christian | storyteller
Isabelle Aurora Grace | Caleb Elias Joseph | Arianne Eleanor Daisy | Everett Joshua Charles | Grace Odilia Lily | Grant Frédéric Conrad
Olivia Charlotte Jane | Samuel Gaspard John | Adele Sofia Eloise | Jack Sebastian Ellis | Eleni Charlotte Jane | Declan Hugo Grey
Trying out: Lillian Cosette | Seamus Emerson | Anne-Claire Isolde
I've recently started a story--join me! havengermany.blogspot.com
June 30th, 2013 03:12 PM #9I'm not feeling incredibly profound at the moment. Check back later.