Results 6 to 10 of 11
May 21st, 2013 07:22 PM #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
I don't think it's a big deal. It's something I might do. I know a few families where this occurred and it never seemed to bother anyone.
I also know two families where multiple children have the SAME name included in their names, because it's a family name, which seems way weirder to me. My cousins (twins) have the same middle name, their father's first name. My baby's Dad has the same middle name as his brother's first name (a grandfather's, I believe). That to me is a bit stranger than one child being named for someone and the others not.Lillian Elizabeth 6.16.13
May 21st, 2013 11:43 PM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
We intentionally use family names in the middle. However, with our second child, we used family names for the first name and the middle. She isn't too happy about not having her "own" name. Says she will change it as soon as she is an adult. But she is only 7, so maybe she will outgrow it! That's actually why we are considering trying to use two family names for baby #4, so she won't be the only one named after two family members.Mom to Alexander Patrick (11), Madelyn Esther (8), Genevieve Susan (3), and Theodore James (stillborn at 37 weeks on February 3, 2014). Expecting #5 (a girl) in May 2015 -- Bridget Dorothy or Penelope Jane.
Boys: Everett, Sebastian, Augustus, Samuel, Julian, Nicholas, Desmond, Jasper, Ezekiel, Malcolm
Girls: Bridget, Felicity, Elizabeth, Penelope, Leona, Ophelia, Elodie, Callista, Miriam, Delilah
May 22nd, 2013 10:17 AM #10
I wouldn't use family names for some children and not others, but I'm just a really picky namer!** The opinions expressed above are not meant to be reflective of Nameberry as a whole but are my opinion and mine alone. **
Henry Nathaniel (3) and Julia Paige (1)
Bennett - Emmett - Felix - Oliver - Owen - Preston - Samuel
Abigail - Claire - Clara - Hope - Lydia - Maude - Molly
May 22nd, 2013 11:55 AM #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
I used family names for one of my daughters (my 4th child) but not for my other kids. I would warn you that if you use family names it sets the expectations among other family member that they or their parents will be honored next. In retrospect I wish I had skipped it all together, because now that my daughter has my mom's name my dad would really, really like us to use his name.Current favorites for hypothetical #7 - Grace Elizabeth and Peter Gregory
May 22nd, 2013 02:14 PM #14
I can't imagine not giving all my children a name that honors my family traditions.
Everyone in my family has a mn (usually 2nd) that honors the heritage of one particular great-great-great grandmother.
I also think if I gave no kid a name derived from a particular family member I would do it for all of them.
I'm not saying that it has a be a direct honoring but I'd want something derived from someone - same meaning, same initials, variant etc.
I don't think I'd restrict myself to people I've meet but would consider the first family member to have come to the US or be born in the US (in my case that would be silly since I'm first generation american but you know what I mean). Someone who shaped what your family considers to be "family" or etc.
If my SO and I stay together our kids (ideally if it were up to me) would have their "own" FN 1MN (to honor his family) 2MN (to honor my family) LN.
And, obviously I'd choose them all.... <wink>...if my husbands has no vote, then....
Endora & Lorelei / Dexter & Gideon
...we are newlyweds and not trying...yet...