Names Searched Right Now:
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 6 to 10 of 14
  1. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Australia
    Posts
    576
    I thought they were girls' names from the heading...
    Thrilled to be mother to @gnes Ei1ish Madeline and Fe1icity Bridget Be@trice

    If we'd had boys the list was: Godfrey, Seamus, Alexander, Michael, Felix, Peter, Ignatius & Sebastian.

  2. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,068
    I think Harper is very handsome and vastly prefer it as a boys name than a girls. I grew up with a guy named Aubrey, so for me it is very masculine but I don't think it's as appealing as Harper.
    Delicious autumn! My very soul is wedded to it, and if I were a bird I would fly about the earth seeking the successive autumns. ~George Eliot

  3. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    15,700
    Although personally I think that Harper and Aubrey are names more suitable for boys, they are both pretty high up on the girls popularity list (in the US at least). I don't like Harper at all for any gender but Aubrey Nathaniel is a handsome combo. I think Harper and Aubrey would make a good sibling duo but most people would probably mistake them for girls if they weren't aware of their mn's.
    All the best,
    Mischa.

  4. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,096
    If you want your boys to be teased, then go ahead. They may be traditionally boy, but are now used primarily for girls. I would not do it.

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    264
    I dislike Harper for both boys and girls. It's a very unattractive sound to me. Both names are viewed as girl names.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •