Names Searched Right Now:
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 6 to 10 of 12
  1. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    U.S.A
    Posts
    2,119
    I think a classic name needs to sound classy throughout a long period of time, but most of all it has to sound classy now. I respectfully disagree with pp's ideas of names like Helen and John. They are a bit dated, and I think they will be for a while. I would just be really surprised to meet a baby named something like that. They were popular for a very long time, but their popularity is waning so I don't consider them as classic. I think maybe these names are what I would consider as classic as it gets.

    Anna and Elizabeth

    James and William

  2. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,921

  3. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,047

  4. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    4,094
    Quote Originally Posted by cupcakelove888 View Post
    I think a classic name needs to sound classy throughout a long period of time, but most of all it has to sound classy now.
    I second the motion.

    For men I would nominate William and James.

    For women it would be Catherine and Elizabeth.

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,298
    I agree wholeheartedly with the suggestions of Elizabeth, William, and James, and will add my beloved classic Jane.
    Simon, Eloise/Louise/Louisa, Faye, Judah, Thea, Felix, Iris, Cordelia, Roscoe, Lydia, Jasper, Phaedra, Adrian, Lucinda, Jane, Wallace, Finnegan, Sylvie, Charlie, Dashiell, Juniper, Atlas, Matilda, Julian, Alice, Marlowe, Octavia, Jack, Marigold, Archer, Gabriel, Persephone, Raphael, Dov

    Just a grad student, dreaming ahead...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •