Names Searched Right Now:
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 15 of 27
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,314

  2. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    North Haven, Connecticut
    Posts
    104
    Me too. Rose was my first love for a girl name and I'm still wrestling with whether I will use it first if we have a girl. I think the middle name should be at least two syllables (our last name is short too). As far as popularity, it's not really that popular as a first name, so that should be fine.
    -an Amelia from a time before 'Amelia' was in the top 100.

    Currently feeling:*Roseanne Amelia* or *Kamal Clifford*

    Girls: Rose, Juliet, Roseanne
    Boys: Beres, Kamal

    TTC Fall 2013!

  3. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    343
    I think Rose is lovely as a first name, and it's far less overdone in that spot than it is in the middle name spot. Some middle name suggestions:

    Rose Arabella
    Rose Beatrix
    Rose Melisande
    Rose Winifred
    Rose Georgina
    Rose Fiona
    Rose Annabelle
    Rose Emmeline

  4. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    3,208
    I wouldn't really consider Rose popular as a first name. In fact it is used less commonly now then it was in the past. Personally, I love Rose on its own. I have never met a Rose. Definitely needs an long elegant middle name.

    I love
    Rose Eleanor
    Rose Eliana
    Rose Helena
    Rose Genevieve
    Rose Caroline
    Rose Catherine
    Ttc a baby brother or sister for Luther Wolf!

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    491
    Rose is definitely not overdone as a first name. It's been years since I've run in to one, and the last one I knew was in her 80s, passed away many years ago. Go for it! I liked the Rose Aurelia suggestion. Sounds pretty.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •