Names Searched Right Now:
Page 18 of 27 FirstFirst ... 8 16 17 18 19 20 ... LastLast
Results 86 to 90 of 135
  1. #86
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    212
    @east93

    I have revised all the descriptions on your list, except the two gender-related ones, which we are addressing en masse. Thanks for drawing our attention to these outdated (sometimes misguided) entries.

  2. #88
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    212
    We're in the process of reevaluating all the unisex listings.

  3. #90
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    212
    Oops--the spelling of Lautner has been corrected. Thanks.

  4. #92
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    212
    We agree--and 'sissified' is now gone.

  5. #94
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    342
    Great thread!!!
    I've realized this as I look up some names. For instance, today I looked up Jeffrey because it's my father's name and I intend to use it as a middle whenever I have children. It's description: "yes, there actually were Jeffreys/Geoffreys in the Middle Ages...but now they're just middle-aged." I understand it's a name from my father's generation but I just think it's so off putting to have descriptions like that! There are so many names that other berries adore that I find to be so outlandish and weird, but i'd never say anything so sassy about them. I think a lot of these need to be changed!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •