Results 86 to 90 of 133
April 15th, 2013 08:01 PM #86
I have revised all the descriptions on your list, except the two gender-related ones, which we are addressing en masse. Thanks for drawing our attention to these outdated (sometimes misguided) entries.
April 15th, 2013 08:03 PM #88
We're in the process of reevaluating all the unisex listings.
April 15th, 2013 08:09 PM #90
Oops--the spelling of Lautner has been corrected. Thanks.
April 15th, 2013 08:11 PM #92
We agree--and 'sissified' is now gone.
April 15th, 2013 08:22 PM #94
I've realized this as I look up some names. For instance, today I looked up Jeffrey because it's my father's name and I intend to use it as a middle whenever I have children. It's description: "yes, there actually were Jeffreys/Geoffreys in the Middle Ages...but now they're just middle-aged." I understand it's a name from my father's generation but I just think it's so off putting to have descriptions like that! There are so many names that other berries adore that I find to be so outlandish and weird, but i'd never say anything so sassy about them. I think a lot of these need to be changed!