Results 1 to 5 of 25
June 30th, 2013 11:07 PM #1
should initials BAM be a deal-breaker?
I got a lot of positive feedback on the combo Brigid Adele a couple of weeks ago...and then I realized our last name starts with M. BAM! Do you think that's a problem? My husband is 100% set on Brigid and Adele is meant to honor his grandmothers, since our 1st daughter is named for mine. Would you keep it since it has significance or should I come up with something else? My BFF growing up has the initials BRO and I don't remember it ever being much of a problem for her. BAM isn't any worse than that, is it?
June 30th, 2013 11:59 PM #3
I don't think it's that bad. When thinking of baby names though, I always think of the initials. However, if you truly love the name then I would go for it- there are worse initials, trust me.Mom to 1 and 1 on the way!
July 1st, 2013 12:03 AM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
BAM is a pretty good set of initials - I think if anyone, especially kids, noticed, they would think it's cool.thalia ♥ josephine ♥ ruby ♥ astrid ♥ clio
julian ♥ adrian ♥ felix ♥ sebastian ♥ ruben
July 1st, 2013 12:09 AM #7Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
July 1st, 2013 12:10 AM #9
BAM is a pretty bad*ss set of initials, imo! Go for it!"I have found the one whom my soul loves"
k ♥ m
Florence ▲ Beatrix ▲ Guinevere ▲ Helena ▲ Vivian
August ▼ Barnaby ▼ Roland ▼ Whitney ▼ Atlas
avatar by *moogley-mog