Names Searched Right Now:
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 15 of 37
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    I like David - I haven't met any baby Davids. I think its classic but I don't see it as overused. At least not in my area.

  2. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    David is too plain for my taste and I don't think it's unexpected. David is along the line of William, John, and Michael- it never goes out. I wouldn't consider it refreshing because it's always been in use.
    I'd go with a more unique mn and call him by his middle

    Fox * Rohan * Jade * Shea * Eden * Blaise * Greer
    Lotus * Noor * Tallulah * Jasper * Linden * Arden

  3. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    I don't really get all the "refreshing" or "unexpected" thoughts. I get that it's not a trendy name or shooting up the charts, but it seems, at least to me, that it's still used quite frequently. I know Davids of all ages and wouldn't find it unexpected for any generation. Too plain? I wouldn't go that far. But it's not a name that I would stop and think "Oh, I like that!".
    Switching careers and becoming an RN! Sadly mommy plans will have to wait until that's done. Still loving names though!

  4. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Southern CA
    I LOVE David! Go for it!
    Mom to James Daniel (11) William Joseph (10), Elise Marie (8), Zachary Allan (2), and George Thomas (baby)

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    David is a nice, classic name. It might be a little "plain" I guess like John or the like, but all the wonderful Davids I know outweigh that. It's solid and you really can't go wrong with it!
    Favourites at the moment ♥

    Leah, Sophie, Claire, Madeleine, Selena, Jillian, Nina, Genevieve, Lily, Justine, Isabelle, Vivian, Athena, Evangeline
    Dominic, Elias, Graham, Noel, Chase, Mattias, Dean, Blake, Daniel, Ronan, Luke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts