Names Searched Right Now:
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    320

    WDYT of this sibset?

    Alright so these names are my guilty pleasures and I absolutely adore them although I think they are a bit unpractical. I have a dream guilty pleasure subset and I want to know what you think of it. Whether it might actually be usable or am I type casting them with edgy and too cool names??

    Garnett (DD)
    Nola (DD)
    Knox (DS)
    Alton (DS)
    Cash (DS)

    I think they make a great set but whether they are usable is the question! Let me know!

  2. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    200
    They'd be totally wearable in my 'hood. We're in Metro DC, and kids have all sorts of names. Do they work together? I'm less sure about that. Knox and Cash sound like brothers, but Alton feels preppier while Knox and Cash are cowboys. Nola is sassy and feminine, but I think Garnett would feel like a boys' name in this set. In another grouping, I would love Garnet/t on a girl. And I'd even love Nola Garnett as a combination.

  3. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    320
    abby- I agree with what you said about Alton vs. Knox and Cash. Alton is much preppier I think. Would Knox, Nola and Cash work? What could Garnett work with subset wise?

  4. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,313
    Nola and Knox are fine and perfectly usable IMO.

    I don't see anything particularly wrong with Garnett or Alton either, they just aren't my style. Garnett sounds very harsh for a little girl, especially as Nola is so soft sounding.

    Cash is the only one I really don't like, I just think of money. Cassius would be better.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •