Names Searched Right Now:
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9
Results 81 to 85 of 85
  1. #81
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,238
    Lets see...there are some I can think of which got quite negative (but constructive) feedback when I asked for opinions on them--generally even if I don't think its a "Nameberry name" I really like hearing opinions on it. Most of them qualify as guilty pleasures though, so it didn't bother me:

    Mafalda
    Araxie
    Dagmar
    Myfanwy
    Montserrat
    Gunnora
    Heloise
    Synnevah (spelled this way)
    Vigdis

    Saint John (prn the English way, Sin-jin, but spelled the correct traditional way)
    Klaus
    Last edited by holbs; August 21st, 2012 at 02:52 PM.

  2. #83
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,572
    I like most of the nameberry names, with the exception of Vivienne (this spelling is just so fru-fru; same goes with Juliette), Penelope, and Wren (nice enough, but I would never use it.)
    I love the name Frederick, and it's Nameberry approved, but it hasn't gotten a lot of love on the forums. Apparently there's an ick sound that's hard to get over. Winston, Cecil, and Alistair aren't getting too much love either.
    A name that I really love but is seen as too much or too old is Dorothea. Oh well! It'd be boring if we all loved the same names- there's still variation here!
    -Athena
    -Athena

    Top Girls: Dorothea Juliet, Jame Fiammetta, Sybil Poet, Araminta Jane, Edith Mariposa, Beatrix Aurelia, Agnes Violet, Louisa Blythe, and Flora Catherine

    Top Boys: Frederick Archer, Darwin Elliot, Crispin Avery, Alistair Henry, Leopold Darcy, Percival Julius, Phinneas Aubrey, Edmund Atlas, Victor Cyril, Albert Ferdinand

  3. #85
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    239
    Chester, Jerome, Marion, and Carole (I expected the meh reactions to Marion and Carole, but the slightly over-vehement responses to Chester and Jerome took me by surprise). Some of my other favourites generally don't go over well, but I don't think I've bothered to try out Roger here.

    Sometimes the viciously glib tone of the definitions in the NB database and the baby name bible bother me...check out Alethea and Arlette, Helga, Bertrand, Cary (which I find dashing on a boy/man, and I *know* I'm not alone). Also, there's a mean-spirited Anice entry; Annis/Annice etc. was the vernacular form of Agnes used in England for, oh, eight hundred years or so (check any British census data prior to 1900). If a name's not in style, there's no need to be mean about it!

  4. #87
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    134
    I have always loved Isabella! Stupid Twilight ruining it. Luckily, I have a niece named Isabella and we call her Bella. Her mom has never even read Twilight...she just loves the name. I love it because it's very feminine like my name (Jennifer) and my sisters names. We all have names that would NEVER be used as boy names and I think Isabella fits into that category, too.

  5. #89
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    269
    I love this thread and so many of your responses! Reading these feels like sneaking candy on a diet.

    Girls:
    Avery
    Mackenzie
    Harper
    Elliette

    Boys:
    Aidan
    Mackenzie
    Addison

    I'd also love to use my maiden name as a first name for one of my children, either gender, (though its not spelled the same its pronounced like a man's name). I think that is a great way to pass on my heritage. I don't understand why surnames are considered "trendy".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •