the unique baby name guide by the world's leading experts
Bookmark and Share

FROM BERTHA TO ANGINA: One Mom’s (Mostly Frustrated) Search for the Right Name

We found Stephany Aulenback’s wonderful blog Crooked House when she wrote about nameberry, and now we’re fans.  Here, Stephany’s take on looking for a name for her baby girl, due in June, and finding that nothing, old or new, feels quite right.

mom_tattooIt was around Christmas time when we started talking about the new baby with Luke so maybe it shouldn’t have been a surprise when he suggested we call it Baby Jesus. His second suggestion, Pooko, was in my opinion, an improvement, if only very marginally.

The other day his preschool teacher asked him what we were going to name the new baby.

He said, “I don’t know. We have to make a list.”

“Oh, you should put the name ‘Libby‘ on the list. I really like that name.”

“I can’t,” he said.

“Why not?” she asked.

“Because ‘Rosie’s’ already on my list. I like the name ‘Rosie.’”

Clearly he’s not quite clear yet on the concept of “list.” I know where he came up with Rosie –when he thinks of the name, he pictures a sweet little girl with curly brown hair who stars on a children’s travel television show. I picture Rosie O’Donnell. I like Rosie O’Donnell. I just don’t want to picture her face when I’m cuddling my newborn.

David’s mother died a month before Luke’s birth. At the time, we already knew we were having a boy. And she’d indicated, without actually coming right out and saying so, that while she liked our choice for a first name, she wasn’t thrilled about our choice of Johann for the second. We’d chosen it because the first Aulenback, a common surname in our region of Nova Scotia, to settle here was a Johann. After she died suddenly a month before his birth, we decided not to use it. (The lesson in that? If you don’t want your loved ones to do something, die.)

Now that we’re having a girl and so can do more to honor David’s mother this time, it has crossed both our minds that we should try to somehow work her name into the new baby’s. The trouble is that while her name, Linda, is pretty and has a lovely meaning, it does not yet seem quite ready for a revival. According to Nameberry it was the most popular name for girls in 1950 and we immediately picture someone, well, round about the age of David’s mother when we say it.

What about her middle name? Well… it was Bertha. While I was surprised when Ruby, a name of a similar vintage, made its comeback, Ruby has grown on me in a way that Bertha just hasn’t. (We actually tried to name our cat, Theo, Ruby until the vet informed us we’d have to go with Rudy.) I don’t see Bertha developing a cachet anytime soon. No, I see Bertha wearing orthopedic tennis shoes with a plus-size skirt. No offense to any Manolo-and-mini-skirt wearing Berthas out there — and I’m sure they exist. Although, come to think of it, I don’t like to think of my baby wearing Manolos or mini skirts either.

David and I were talking about — over, around — this dilemma late last night when all sensible people were either asleep or ordering grills from the Home Shopping Network. We really, really want to honour David’s mother. But we don’t much like the name, not for someone born in 2009. My brilliant solution? Why not give the new baby the middle name “Mom”? That way, we’d be paying homage to my own mother, too. (My own mother’s name just happens to be Ruth Alvira.)

The other problem I have with choosing a name is that I’m a bit of a misanthrope. I know people steer clear of the names of exes, say, or of children who picked on them back in elementary school, or of mean bosses, or, I don’t know, psychopathic killers. But I have trouble with any name that has actually already belonged to a human being. Even if I really like you — even if I really love you — I’m unlikely to want to burden my fresh new baby with your used kleenex of a name. And yet, however much I like to think that I’m a creative person (after all, I’m creating a whole new person here right in my midsection), I’m not really a fan of “creative” names. Here’s the kind of list I come up with when I try to get creative.

Words That Would Make Nice Names for Babies, If It Weren’t For Their Unsuitable Meanings

FOR GIRLS

Angina
Calorie
Dyslexia
Feta
Plaice
Reciprocity
Uvula

FOR BOYS

Bench
Caftan
Chyle
Raunch
Rennet
Roily
Torrid
Thwart
Fellatio

Stephany Aulenback lives in Nova Scotia with her husband David and her three-year-old son Luke, whose baby sister will be born in June. Stephany blogs at Crooked House.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Tags: , , , , , , ,

9 Responses to “FROM BERTHA TO ANGINA: One Mom’s (Mostly Frustrated) Search for the Right Name”
Mary Says:

March 2nd, 2009 at 10:16 am

What about a variation on Linda, such as Lindy or Belinda or Linden (like the tree, not the president)?

Lola Says:

March 2nd, 2009 at 10:20 am

Suggestion for honoring a beloved Linda? Belinda or Rosalind. I am enchanted by both. Belinda, nn Bella or Rosalind nickname Rosie? There would be a great way to get the Rosie he seems to want, and gets her something a bit less boisterous than “just” Rosie. Rosalind could also be simply Rose or the upbeat, retro Lindy. Belinda Ruth? Rosalind Ruth? Might work. Just thinking. But then, I’d take Alvira, make it Elvira and use it in front. There’s an Ellie I could live with!

JLyn Says:

March 2nd, 2009 at 12:50 pm

Lola, what great suggestions! I thought of Belinda as well to honor my mom, Susan Linda.

susan Says:

March 2nd, 2009 at 1:40 pm

Love your blog, Stephany-it’s so funny! I loved your idea of giving your daughter Mom as a middle name! Made me giggle!
I thought of some ways to honor your mother and mother-in-law without actually using their names. You could honor them with their names’ meanings. Except for Ruth-I would keep that actual name. Ruth would be a wonderful middle name. I would use it for sure because it’s coming back in style.
Bertha – I wouldn’t want to use this either. But Bertha means bright, a lovely meaning. Clara and Phoebe are wonderful names and they mean bright, too.
Linda – Linda means pretty but is a bit dated. Jolie means pretty and is so stylish.
Alvira means fair, white. So do Bianca and Rosalba. Rosalba means a white rose.

Elisabeth@YCCII Says:

March 2nd, 2009 at 10:45 pm

I hear you. Currently going through the same thing for our bean due in June. But it is fun to think of names for others! This is a challenge right up my alley.

Linda means “beautiful”, as has been covered. Suggestions of Rosalind, Belinda, and Clara and Phoebe to get to Bertha’s “bright” are fab.

For Linda, try others that mean beautiful but sound a bit more contemporary:
Anwen
Belle
Calista

You could also hit both mothers in one swoop with Belphoebe as a middle name and get to choose a first name that you really like. For what it’s worth, I think Ruth is a wonderful underused name that sounds great with almost anything. Good luck! Off to check out your blog now.

marikm Says:

March 10th, 2009 at 10:52 pm

My boyfriend claims he wants to name his future daughter Chlamydia… I must admit, it is sort of pretty…

mother of Eve Says:

March 27th, 2009 at 9:28 pm

Anathema would be a beautiful name :)

I think Lindy would be great. It’s got a bit of a masculine and jaunty air because of Lindburgh, but still feminine and modern sounding.

Diana Says:

May 15th, 2009 at 10:13 am

Let’s hope a certain family in Alaska reads this. It will give them plenty of ideas. May I also suggest Clamydia.

Jen @ blissfully caffeinated Says:

July 20th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

And now Uvula is at the top of my list.

Dying laughing at your kid wanting to call the new one Baby Jesus. My girls have suggested Glitter, Sparkles, Rainbow and Pinky for our unborn child. As we don’t want to steer her in the direction of exoctic dancer as a career, we will probably not use any of their suggestions.

Heading straight to your blog now.

Leave a Reply

Search
Categories